Dharmasthala Case Twist: Complainant Arrested, Questions Rise Over SIT’s Action

“Karnataka’s Dharmasthala case takes a shocking turn as SIT arrests the key complainant. Earlier reports spoke of missing girls and skeletons, but now the narrative has changed. What really happened?”

Major Twist in the Dharmasthala Case

Karnataka’s most sensational case from Dharmasthala has taken a new turn. The complainant, who earlier accused the temple town of multiple murders, sexual assaults, and secret burials, has now been arrested by the Special Investigation Team (SIT). This shocking twist has raised serious doubts about the investigation and the changing media narrative.

What Were the Allegations?

The complainant, a former sanitation worker, claimed that between 1995 and 2014 he was forced to bury bodies of women and minors. He even alleged that some of the skeletons showed signs of sexual abuse.

At that time, the story spread like wildfire—many media reports suggested that several young girls were missing and that even skeletal remains were discovered. Families of missing girls came forward demanding justice.

Why Was the Complainant Arrested?

After hours of interrogation, SIT chief Pranab Mohanty reported that the complainant’s statements and documents contained major inconsistencies. Based on this, the SIT arrested him and presented him in court.

But this arrest has triggered more questions than answers.

Unanswered Questions

• If the allegations were false, why are families still searching for their missing daughters?
• Why did media initially report about skeletons and missing girls, but now the story has suddenly changed?
• Is the SIT truly working independently, or is there an attempt to suppress the truth?

Government’s Stand

Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar has stated that the government is neutral in this case. He assured that the investigation will remain impartial and action will be taken against whoever is guilty.

Public Demands Judicial Supervision

Many activists and families are now demanding that the investigation should be monitored by the judiciary. Public trust in police and agencies has often been questioned in India, which is why people now look towards the courts for justice.

Why This Case Matters

For families who lost their daughters, this case is not just about media headlines—it is about truth, closure, and justice. The sudden change in narrative has only deepened their pain.

Have Your Say

What do you think?

• Was the complainant telling the truth?
• Or is this case based on false claims?

Your opinion matters. Share your views in the comments below.

Bureau Report : Khabar 24 Express, Karnataka

Share on Facebook

Tweet

Follow us

Save